Speaking in the macro way, it seems that changes of important national systems and policies exert huge influence on enterprises. However, according to my observation since 2004, many issues existing in enterprises in China are not necessarily caused by significant national systems and policies, and many problems of enterprises and investors play a passive role in prospect of Chinese enterprises. In the microcosmic way, many people hold the opinion that enterprises are utterly capable of overcoming influence exerted by the external world, and they have acquired competitive advantages through their impendent management and technology innovation strategy, but objectively enterprises in China basically fail to do so or adhere to these points, and they link enterprise capital with public power coincidentally.

I have set about the study course since 2004 and this is closely related with my theoretical study, research and practice. Among these, practice has occupied much of the work time, such as marketing, overall management and comprehensive consultation in enterprises; theoretical study consumes much time, too. My reading, pondering and writing are involved with many areas ranged from enterprise management, economics, politics to society and historical literature. I highlight on weights about survey and review on Chinese enterprises in all-round way along with the collapse of Delong and Kelon. Then my practice and theoretical exploration goes into enterprise social issues from general enterprise management. By the end of 2008, I had been to almost all economic development zones and industrial enterprise distribution areas in China, contacted thousands of actual controllers and management personnel of state-owned enterprises, private enterprise bosses or investors, professional managers rich in professional and working experience, and various technical migrant worker and regular worker representatives, and had a good grasp of enterprise social contradictions in China and their developmental course.